Microcap spice download

The use of Micro-CAP software and analogy methods as a tool to simulate the operating processes of an electromagnetic impulse device is.. Asset owners are starting to recognize the case for microcap investing, both as. Download PDF. Large defined as Deciles of market cap, Small defined as Deciles of market cap, and Micro defined as Deciles of market cap.. Micro-Cap 10, the tenth generation, blends a modern, intuitive interface with robust numerical algorithms to produce unparalleled levels of..

Micro-Cap is a schematic editor for electronic engineers which allows you to create interactive.. Version 6. Software and Micro-Cap. Evaluation version Download Micro-Cap for free. Download This Theme. Install Micro-Cap 9. This pack is intended only for the version of the Micro-Cap 9.

If you just want nice looking schematics not necessarily for publication I would suggest getting comfortable with your EDA software of preference I like Kicad. I used Visio at one place I worked because it was closest thing to a CAD that I can use without the hassle of getting approval for req. I wrote a converter program to convert our CAD footprint and component models into it and used that a lot for placement plannng.

KiCad can export schematic drawings to. I agree. TinyCAD is quick, easy, reasonable library. Easiest way to bang out a schematic. Just n case someone else want to buy that right perhaps. But also, releasing source code may have a cost. I seem to recall reading that when Netscape went open source, the company spent time and money preparing the code. Maybe it needed to be cleaned up. Maybe it was one last update, but I vaguely recall more work was required.

Spice software quite often contain trade secrets. Spice models are serious business for simulation as it is only as good as the models. Also there are some serious legal consequences if the software vendor rectroactively open sourced the code. It was a couple days before the source was sanitized enough for publishing again. If I could get this to run on Linux Mint it would actually be useful.

I am running Microcap just fine with Wine. Make sure you have the right Wine installed 32bit vs 64bit for the version of the executable you are trying to run. Click playonlinux Configure select microcap12 virtual drive Click make a new shortcut from this virtual drive select mc Thanks… turns out my problem was Ubuntu, who screwed up a library needed to install Wine; sorting it out now on Mint forum…..

Aaaaand it works! Had to disable mscoree in winecfg and it played nice. The company behind MicroCap has closed after its founder has retired. It was pretty much a one-man shop. Another string in my bow of simulation tools. The only nice things I can say about his stance on religion is that it was hard to dig through the website to find. Poor and out of date documentations and almost vegan type of politics are a turn off. You assume he is being greedy, but FOSS means he can contribute to development.

Maybe he wants to add new features? Well, except for complaining on Github I guess…. The fact is that there is no way to say how many people who talk like that actually contribute to the projects as there is no statistical analysis of people who talk like that. That being said, it is very presumptious to think that your personal experiences of people who talk like that stand for a representation of the general public of FOSS projects.

Then it is also illogical to chalk people who talk like that specifically to be greedy but that person could just be anti authoritarian.

I dont often contribute specifically to FOSS projects, I write detailed bug reports when i run into them but i dont contribute code except for one or two projects. Does this mean i am greedy because i run several different packages but i only contribute to one or two?

Does that mean that i am only allowed to run the packages that i contribute to? In my opinion, closed source software is greedy and open source is cheap. Im neither of those posters but yes i am a cheap ass and i use FOSS because i dont have to pay some large conglomerate for their shitty software that is just as buggy as any other piece of software.

The fact is that the more people who use FOSS encourage even more people to use FOSS creating a network effect that benifits the group more than the individual, so championing for FOSS even without code contribution is still a contribution and thus not really greedy. Open source projects can be successful, but only if they reach a large size and financial support. To claim otherwise shows a lack of experience.

Other projects rely heavily on the code originator, or someone who took over. Most of the contributions end up being fixes. For anything larger you need a lot of organization to integrate the submissions and ensure a certain quality. Almost nobody can do that on the side, unpayed. Attitude says a lot about what to expect from people.

Asking kindly or saying code or GTFO is not the same. Asking for statistical data for everything is just a cheap way to disagree. Maybe you should try Bayesian statistics to understand how people are able to act with incomplete information.

You think network effects just make it happen magically. You added no statistics of your own, either. You simply hate against individual software developers who make a living from software, and compare them to big conglomerates.

You are really brave, I admire you. Yes, especially Linux, who would have thought…. Yes, those are also single people you insult, actually the lifetime of their work. To that I have to relate this story. I volunteer at a small rural county museum, where the coordinator relies on her son.

He is someone who is big on FOSS concept. My response was I like the concept, but it has a butt loade of hard core rigid unmoving attitude. Problem being one can never know if the whiners are the doers, or the freeloaders, who never donate financial support to the projects they use on a daily basis. LTSpice is nice and fast, but remember it's made free to use as a promotion tool for Linear now Analog Devices. It can absolutely be used as a general-purpose simulator, but don't expect AD to make your life easier for this.

Benta Super Contributor Posts: Country:. There are dedicated forums for this here. Moderator will probably move your thread. Quote from: Zero on March 16, , pm.

There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope. Quote from: Benta on March 16, , pm. The following users thanked this post: Mecanix. On the maintenance concern, interestingly enough it asked me to update its library and another module right after dwloading and installing the latest release.

Guess I'll have to give it a go for a week or two and see how it goes. Kinda like the fact that it's far easier to create objects than the other Appreciate the comments and advice so far!

Quote from: Simon on March 16, , pm. You're right, I must have had a brain fart here. My only excuse is, that I was simultaneously on another CAD forum at the time. Slightly misplaced considering the majority of the topics in this section of the forum are existing projects. Thought it would be qualified in the Designs section though, and certainly does qualify in the Technical Stuff one It's absolutely mind blowing Well I would rename the forums, most peoples ego's will not permit them to use the beginners section.

I use the beginners and technical sections as "simple questions" and "more complicated questions. Yes but the section is for board design software really, if there is to be a ltspice section then there needs to be one for each major simulator out there or a subsection for all simulators maybe in there. There is a big 'meh' factor to moving this thread. Quote from: Simon on March 17, , pm.

You should create a forum here for people who are interested in learning and using the frozen free Microcap. That would be a real service to people like me beginner, really who have never used a full featured program like that and especially would like to try the simulation.

Peabody Super Contributor Posts: Country:.